www.ecofys.comwww.ecostream.comwww.wnf.nl
 
Feedback    FAQ    Advertise    Site Map    
Europe  
 
  News
 
GreenPrices Weekly
nr. 104, 19 June 2008

Concerns about Irish 'No' to Lisbon Treaty

Editorial

'Renewable energy trade issue solved'

EU to investigate US biodiesel imports

Reactions to the biofuels row

The EU-US row over biofuels trade

Argentina: the next South American biofuel superpower?

Energy efficiency associations: mandatory target of 20% by 2020

EU Parliament supports full ownership unbundling for electricity

The Sustatement

In Brief

- EU GHG emissions fell by 14 million tonnes: EEA

- German government approves efficiency laws

- Eurelectric: carbon neutral power generation by 2050

- UK advice: turn up renewables policies

- Iberdrola and Gamesa to join forces in the wind sector

- Growing pressure for grid connection with Northern Africa

- ‘Biofuels from tropical climates far more effective’: SEI report

- G8 publishes Action Plan to attract private capital

- BP Energy Review: 2.4% growth of global primary energy consumption

- Energy and Climate policy the best response to rising oil prices: EU Commission

- Dutch government investigates energy island in the North Sea

- Companies news in brief

Agenda

Irish 'NO': the risks for energy and climate policies
19 June 2008 - Last week, Ireland voted in a referendum against the proposed 'Lisbon Treaty'. The Treaty was already a diluted Constitution law, following rejections by similar referenda in France and the Netherlands. Nevertheless, the Irish obviously fear the power redistribution in the EU, from national governments towards Brussels.  

In fact, the Irish decision puts the Lisbon Treaty on ice, because a unanimous YES by all Member States is required. Brussels stresses that the Treaty is not dead yet, but it's not clear how to proceed from here.

It is an interesting question how this decision will affect the EU's position in energy and climate. In the long run, the Treaty would definitely have had a positive influence on the ability of the EU to act as one political unit in energy and climate policies, as it would have in foreign policies.

In the short term, there should be concerns about the Energy and Climate package and the international negotiations regarding a post-Kyoto climate policy agreement.

Most experts in the field think that the EU train running on the track of energy and climate will not be stopped, not even delayed. However, the time schedule for adoption of the package by both the Council and the Parliament is very tight and delicate.

Is the commitment of France, the next EU President, to energy and climate sufficiently large to withstand the critical stage of the EU Treaty? It would be rather dangerous to leave the finalization of the package to the Czech Republic, with its climate-skeptical President.

All 27 Member States have agreed on the general outlines of the Energy and Climate Package. But now the 'devils in the details' emerge and Member States are negotiating about their positions.

I surely hope this will not water down any commitment, because that will also affect the international position in the post-Kyoto negotiations.

The next few days, with the Council of EU government leaders in Brussels, will reveal a lot more about the resistance of the EU against attacks from the inside.

Rolf de Vos
Editor in chief
GreenPrices
r.devos@greenprices.com


 


 
Source: GP Newsdesk

             
  The content of this site is provided by Ecofys B.V.
Read the Terms and Conditions Greenprices.