www.ecofys.comwww.ecostream.comwww.wnf.nl
 
Feedback    FAQ    Advertise    Site Map    
Europe  
 
 
 
GreenPrices Weekly
nr. 105, 26 June 2008

John McCain launches energy strategies

McCain's strategy criticised

Editorial: The American way

Council: No certificates for target counting

"Transition period towards internal green energy market"

The Sustatement

Installed wind capacity to reach 576 GW by 2020: EER

Top CEOs urge climate action

In Brief

- EU-OPEC energy dialogue tries to go beyond oil

- Enercon and Markbygden Vind to build 3500 MW of wind farms

- $70 million for research in carbonate reservoirs and CO2 storage

- Towards US first offshore wind farm

- US solar power ‘grid parity’ to be reached by 2015: Clean Edge Study

- ICT technologies key to global emissions reductions

- Solar company REC to invest €1.6 billion in Singapore

- GE: "US tax revenues exceed wind energy tax incentives"

- US Senate blocks two climate action plans

- Company News in Brief

Agenda

The Sustatement


26 June 2008 - Every week we invite stakeholders in the sustainable energy business to react on an actual statement.
 


This month, following the discussion about the need for sustainability criteria required to reach the 10% biofuels target within the EU Directive for the Promotion of Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency, the claim is:

"The 10% EU target is required to establish a 100% sustainable biofuels market within ten years”

This week, our guest commenting on this Sustatement is Adrian Bebb, Friends of the Earth Agrofuels Campaign Coordinator.

“Europe’s 10% biofuel target should be abolished because the current biofuel market is completely unsustainable and is directly contributing to the rising food prices crisis and increasing deforestation.

According to reports from the IMF and the World Bank, by using agricultural products from the food chain to feed cars, the biofuels market contributed some 30% to the rising food prices.

Biofuels are not a solution to reduce emissions from the transport sector. Actually they are an inefficient way to use biomass, often even worse for the climate than using oil. The real solution would be sorting out our current transport system using more efficient cars and public transport systems. Biofuels in this context are a false solution.

The theory that a first generation biofuels market is needed as a bridge towards second generation biofuels is nonsense. It's only an excuse to build a huge infrastructure for the current unsustainable biofuels market. Furthermore, second generation biofuels are still under a big question mark regarding real sustainability.

Concerning the whole sustainability criteria being discussed in Brussels, I consider it as a green wash that will never work. The biofuels market is too complex, land-use change is very hard to track, and large-scale production is impossible to control. Europe could come up with criteria, but the truth is that to implement and monitor these criteria elsewhere - like in Malaysia, Brazil or Indonesia, where governments are weak and laws are rarely enforced - is impossible.

Today, biofuels represent around 2% of the fuel used in transport in Europe and already this is unsustainable. If a mandatory target of 10% is to be imposed, the results would be disastrous.

I believe that without the EU mandatory targets, the biofuel market will collapse due to increasing evidence of its unsustainability.”

 
Source: GP Newsdesk

             
  The content of this site is provided by Ecofys B.V.
Read the Terms and Conditions Greenprices.