www.ecofys.comwww.ecostream.comwww.wnf.nl
 
Feedback    FAQ    Advertise    Site Map    
Europe  
 
  News
 
Contents GreenPrices Weekly nr. 98,
8 May 2008

First details of Parliament reports on climate action package

Global carbon market reached €47 billion in 2007: World Bank

Carbon market actors call for a post-Kyoto global agreement

The future of CDM

"CCS mandatory from 2015"

The challenges of recasting the EPBD policy

Stern proposes keys to a global climate change agreement

UK MPs reject feed-in tariffs

Editorial: Compromise in green energy trade

In Brief

Greenpeace denounces CCS as 'false hope'

Second generation biofuels microbe discovered

Finnish minister stresses urgency of renewable investments

Shell withdraws from UK’s offshore wind flagship

EU Commission launches consultation in offshore wind energy

BP to invest $1 billion in Brazil’s sustainable biofuels

France’s EDF adds 251 MW to its wind energy portfolio

German utility EnBW to invest €3 billion on renewable energies

E.ON to build new 200 MW offshore wind farm in Denmark

Gabriel in favour of higher wind subsidies

UK: 315 MW of offshore wind power to be exported through submarine cables

News in brief from Brussels

Company News in brief

Editorial: Compromise in green energy trade

 
Finally a compromise regarding trade of green energy certificates looms at the horizon. The quarrel between energy suppliers, the renewable energy industry and some Member States was not solved in the Commission's proposal for a renewable energy directive for the period 2010-2020. But the evaluation of the draft Directive by the European Parliament committee of Industry, Transport and energy will most likely bring parties together. 

Without the details being known yet, we can anticipate that the amendments proposed by the Parliament Committee will have to keep the best of both worlds.

On one hand, Member States will be able to decide to import or export Guarantees of Origin. The opportunity to voluntarily 'opt-in' to a trade scheme should appease the opponents of trade, while countries that really demand the possibility for trade should get the right guidance for it. According to several lawyers, the legal quality of an opt-in system would be much better than an opt-out system.

On the other hand, the use of GoOs for the voluntary market is most likely to be conserved. The Commission's proposal didn't have anything to offer to the voluntary market after 2010. However,  by splitting the function of GoOs – both for the voluntary market for green energy and for the mandatory market counting towards a country's target – this voluntary market can grow further.

How the technical splitting should be established is not yet clear, other details still have to be filled in. Now it will become interesting to know the reaction of the Commission and the Council. In the end, all three parties will have to agree unanimously. The progress that has already been made on the issue of green energy trade paves the ground for a quick final decision, maybe this year, or in spring 2009 at the latest.

Rolf de Vos
Editor in chief
GreenPrices
r.devos@greenprices.com



   

 

 
Source: GP Newsdesk

             
  The content of this site is provided by Ecofys B.V.
Read the Terms and Conditions Greenprices.